SEO-Simplifying

I have been operating within the SEO trade for pretty much five years currently. To some i'm simply a young pup, however i have to say the results we have a tendency to get from our SEO campaigns represent themselves.

When you add this field of SEO you tend to network with different SEO professionals and keep tuned with the most recent SEO waves or updates from Google. you furthermore may act with different SEO consultants within the forums and blogs.

I want to specific my concern with the quantity of quality supplementary to the topic of SEO. concerning eightieth of data on SEO out there's too deep and sophisticated, with associate awful ton of opinions.

Like any technology or methodology, individuals area unit yearning for usability. they need one thing that works, creates an impression or makes a distinction. This same conception applies to SEO.

Using a technology needs protruding with the fundamentals of that technology. If you sift through the thousands of obtainable "sources" you'll typically find the $64000 supply, and this can be the knowledge and technique one ought to use once understanding a way to approach it. this can be the right thanks to learn and apply something.

I realize it superb however some SEO consultants throw their opinions out on their high-powered blogs, solely to confuse another thousand SEO consultants.

It is thus laughable to look at, and it goes like this:

    SEO professional Joe, has to get "green carrots" on page one of Google for a shopper.

 he's performing on it for months, bookmarking, social networks, links etc.

 once 2-3 months he takes a step back and appears at his traveler and keyword stats. Not abundant modification, he simply is not obtaining the results and his shopper is getting down to marvel.

    Suddenly he realizes that a cool video on YouTube might boost things up and get's this made an internet.

 the subsequent week "green carrots" is on page 1! It's nice, it worked and also the shopper is all happy.

 once sitting back relaxed and searching at his results, he suddenly realizes that he ne'er optimised the content of his page with enough keywords. Oops. He solely mentioned "green carrots" once and still got a page one result. This strikes him as strange and it appears to violate everything he learned concerning page optimization in SEO.

What happens next is attention-grabbing. The SEO professional decides this can be valuable data and knowledge. He has simply seen the subsequent new search rule play, that ought to be shared with anyone doing SEO:

"Google isn't any longer giving any worth to keyword density. This plays no half in SEO."

He writes a pleasant one thousand word article concerning it and because of his expertise, is very bound of his findings. He even makes a jab at Google concerning no mentioning it to anyone. currently he has approval for locating this out before anyone else.

This is very frustrating for anyone World Health Organization needs to be told the topic of SEO or perhaps old style SEO professionals.And is thanks to this short-sightedness that the net is crammed with several pages concerning SEO which might be higher set within the trash.

Now do not get Maine wrong, i'm not talking concerning the various terribly helpful articles, digests associated tutorials out there which might greatly assist an SEO professional to induce his job done quicker. i'm talking concerning those folks that produce their own interpretations of what's a particularly precise and logical technology - SEO.

Adding confusion to the topic

I have a true example of this. Last week I browse and article from a "leading SEO source", Seomoz. In their article the fundamentals of computer program Friendly style and Development, they state loud and daring that:

"Keyword density is, while not question, NOT an area of recent net computer program ranking algorithms for the straightforward reason that it provides so much worse results than several different, additional advanced strategies of keyword analysis."

Quite a statement! Who's your source? They documented Dr. Edel Garcia's seminal work on the subject - The Keyword Density of Non-Sense. If you undergo this source's article, Dr. Edel Garcia tries to interrupt down the mathematical equation of keyword density rising search results and within the ends purportedly proves it couldn't be true.

The final statement in Seomoz's touch upon keyword density is amusing.

"Dr. Garcia's background in data retrieval and his mathematical proofs ought to expose any notion that keyword density may be accustomed facilitate "optimize" a page for higher rankings. However, this same document illustrates the unfortunate truth concerning keyword optimisation - while not access to a world index of sites (to calculate term weight) and a representative corpus of the Internet's collected documents (to facilitate build a linguistics library), we've got very little probability to form formulas that might be useful for true optimisation."

What will this all mean? In outline, Seomoz told its thousands of followers that "Keyword density has NO half in SEO". Then they assert at the tip that they are doing not have access to enough search results (Google's database) to completely validate it. Huh? Why mention it then?

How to modify SEO

On the alternative aspect of this story, there area unit several intelligent SEO consultants World Health Organization work from the supply of SEO itself and ne'er deviate. These area unit a number of the best SEO corporations and SEO consultants within the world.

So back to the purpose, the straightforward question lingering on North American nation now could be, "Who is that the source?".

Let's take a glance shall we?

Who decides what ranks well?

Who decides if your content is good?

Who decides if your keywords match what individuals area unit wanting for?

Who determines if associate external link has authority or value?

The answer is simple: Google.

The attention-grabbing issue that I found once rebuke different SEO professionals is that they prefer to follow different consultants thanks to their portfolios, enticing articles and different charm factors.

But, if you would like to induce into the inwardness of it all, you best bet is to travel back to supply.

Matt Cutts from Google's Search Team provides many videos, articles and updates to stay SEO consultants such as you from falling into the dark pit of failing websites.

Google needs quality, they need results and that they need a nice user expertise. the sole method they're going to accomplish this can be obtaining SEO corporations and their individual workers to grasp what their vision is further as however they work.

Just last week a young SEO company in London contacted North American nation to require over 2 failing SEO campaigns they were running. they'd gotten themselves into all types of odd-ball SEO practices and were, of course, failing.

Our Campaign Manager merely referred them to the applicable Google articles on SEO and web site quality tips and that they area unit currently back heading in the right direction.

Summary

When you bump into "new and exciting SEO information", take the time to verify it with the multiple resource websites out there from Google. do not simply jump in and trust everything another blogger wrote. it should or might not be true, however it's your name on the road as associate SEO skilled.

I hope this helps in obtaining your SEO campaigns more practical and by the book.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6932851